1. BAN is the world’s
only organization focused on confronting the global environmental injustice and
economic inefficiency of toxic trade (toxic wastes, products and technologies)
and its devastating impacts. Working at the nexus of human rights and environment,
we confront the issues of environmental justice at a macro level, preventing
disproportionate and unsustainable dumping of the world’s toxic waste and
pollution on our global village’s poorest residents. At the same time we
actively promote the sustainable and just solutions to our consumption and
waste crises — banning waste trade, while promoting green, toxic free and
democratic design of consumer products.
A summary of what it is would be works to prevent the globalization of the
toxic chemical crisis. They work to ensure national self-sufficiency in waste
management through clean production and toxics use reductions and in support of
the principle of global environmental justice.
2.
625 Plum Industrial Ct.
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15239
United States
or
4105 Leap Road
Hilliard, Ohio, 43026
United States
3.
Haiti, Afghanistan
If
a country has signed the treaty but has not yet ratified it, this is indicated
by the word "signature".
4.reduce
reuse recycle responsibility
And although espousing this
catch-phrase, it is inevitable that most of the emphasis is on recycling, less
on reuse, and even less on waste reduction. Moreover, what is forgotten in this
view is a vital fourth R: Responsibility. This includes the produoer’s
responsibility not to produce products that are toxic or that possess other
environmental liabilities, and to take full financial responsibility for the
entire life cycle of their wastes and products. It also includes the national
responsibility to become self-sutficient in hazardous waste management, as
called for in the Basel Convention (see Geiser and Ticlcner, this volume) and
to halt all exports of hazardous wastes from developed to developing countries
as called for in the Basel Convention’s Ban Amendment.
These views I think in my opinion are at odds with the
situation these countries that this is happening to are less fortunate then us
and have to do anything to survive. I think instead of stopping it which should
help them do it more safely and that would cause a lot less damage to the
planet. My role with the responsibility is to make sure I’m not causing any
electronic waste and to say something if I see it happen.
5. Its dumping this waste in third world countries because
we wouldn’t do it here because people would say something but if we do it
somewhere else and they profit of it no one seems to care which is totally
wrong.
Some real costs of doing this is destroying our planet that
we live on and more importantly its killing people and causing unsafe
environments to live in for these countries where it is happening.
It does reflect social justice because just because these
people have a different economical way of living and are less fortunate then us
there still people and should be treated like it.
No comments:
Post a Comment